Yet the ability of most neoliberal states to protect the lives and livelihoods of those most at risk has proven woefully inadequate. With recent scientific debate suggesting that viruses with pandemic potential may become commonplace, a post-COVID world seems likely to be one of sustained crises. If the state is to be an effective actor in the post-COVID future, we must build on the empirical evidence around us to make the case that sustained public wealth will always be essential to our collective survival. At the very least, a wealth tax needs to be considered as a means to recalibrate the financial gains made by a handful of individuals during the pandemic. Here we make the case for a tax on wealth, drawing on both consequentialist and non-consequentialist notions of justice, suggesting that a wealth tax may offer a crucial antidote to the social inequalities that have intensified as a result of COVID-19. While there has been much discussion of wealth taxes, building popular support for a tax on the rich is extraordinarily difficult.
In placing the individual at the centre of this essay, we argue for a wealth tax targeting the super-rich to restore equality, decency, and the social contract. While this literature offers insights into the social, economic, environmental, and political importance of corporate tax, few focus on the individual.
Over the last 30 years, Critical Perspectives on Accounting has published work placing tax as the central object of study.
0 kommentar(er)
